Y Combinator Question 37: How Can You Restate the Hard Ideas (Disaggregate Ideas into Smaller Ideas)

This Y Combinator question is aimed at evaluating how your startup approaches complex projects by breaking them down into manageable components. Y Combinator Question 37: How Can You Restate the Hard Ideas (Disaggregate Ideas into Smaller Ideas)


Disaggregating challenging ideas into smaller, actionable parts is crucial for making progress in development, ensuring a more systematic approach to problem-solving and project management.

1. Why Y Combinator Asks This Question

Y Combinator seeks to understand if your team has the ability to deconstruct complex ideas to overcome potential barriers in execution. This ability indicates a sophisticated approach to product development that enhances manageability, improves clarity, and increases the likelihood of successful implementation.

It also reflects on your team’s problem-solving skills and adaptability.

2. How to Answer the Question

Explain the process your team uses to break down complex ideas into smaller, more feasible tasks. Describe specific techniques or strategies you employ, such as modular development, phased implementations, or MVP (Minimum Viable Product) approaches.

Provide an example of a complex project you have tackled by disaggregating it into smaller components and explain how this approach facilitated the project’s success.

For instance, if you’re developing a complex software platform, you might discuss how you separated the project into core functionalities, user interface development, and backend integration, tackling each as a separate module.

3. How NOT to Answer the Question

Avoid suggesting that your team tackles large projects in one go without breaking them down, as this can indicate a lack of strategic project management skills.

Don’t give generic answers that fail to provide concrete examples of how you have successfully applied this approach in the past.

4. An Example, Based on a Tech Startup

Consider a tech startup, FinTechPro, that develops a complex financial analytics tool for large enterprises. Here’s how they might respond:
  • Disaggregation Approach: “For our financial analytics tool, which involved integrating multiple data sources and implementing advanced predictive analytics, we initially faced several significant challenges that seemed daunting as a whole.”

Breaking Down the Idea
  • Phase 1: Data Integration Module: “We started by focusing solely on the data integration part, ensuring our platform could effectively pull and synchronize data from various enterprise systems without disrupting existing operations.”
  • Phase 2: Basic Analytics Features: “Once data integration was stable, we developed basic analytics functionalities, allowing users to generate standard financial reports and visualizations. This provided immediate value and feedback while we worked on more complex features.”
  • Phase 3: Advanced Predictive Analytics: “The final phase involved layering on more sophisticated predictive models and machine learning algorithms, which were built on the foundation laid by the earlier phases.”
  • Outcome: “This step-by-step disaggregation allowed us to manage risks effectively, focus on solving one major problem at a time, and iterate based on user feedback at each stage. It turned a seemingly overwhelming project into a series of manageable, successful launches.”
Y Combinator evaluates how startups manage complex projects by breaking them down into manageable components, revealing their systematic approach to problem-solving and enhancing the likelihood of successful implementation.

Leave a comment

Leave a comment, an idea, a related blog post on X (Twitter)

X (Twitter)